Many teams treat risk management as a project to be completed before a product launch. However, that’s a critical misunderstanding of the process. True ISO 14971 risk management is a continuous cycle that lives and breathes with your product for its entire lifecycle. It starts with the first design sketch and continues through manufacturing, distribution, and post-market surveillance, only ending when the last device is no longer in use. This guide is designed to shift your perspective, walking you through the steps to create and maintain a living system that adapts to new information and ensures safety remains a priority long after your product hits the market.
Key Takeaways
- Risk management is a continuous cycle, not a one-time task: Your responsibilities extend throughout the entire product lifecycle, requiring you to actively monitor your device post-market and update your risk assessments with real-world data.
- Prioritize risk controls that design out hazards: The most effective way to manage risk is to eliminate it at the design stage. Use protective measures as your next option, and only rely on safety information or warnings as a final step.
- Your Risk Management File is a living document: This file is the central proof of your compliance and must be fully integrated with your Quality Management System (QMS), consistently updated to reflect the current state of your product’s risk profile.
What Is ISO 14971 Risk Management?
If you’re in the medical device industry, you’ve likely heard of ISO 14971. At its core, this standard is a framework for managing the risks associated with medical devices. It’s not just about creating a list of what could go wrong; it’s a systematic process that guides your company through identifying, analyzing, evaluating, controlling, and monitoring risks throughout your product’s entire lifecycle—from the initial design concept to post-market activities.
Think of it as your roadmap for ensuring safety. The standard helps you make informed decisions by weighing the potential risks of a device against its intended benefits. By following this internationally recognized process, you can build safer products, meet critical regulatory expectations, and protect both patients and your business. It’s a proactive approach that embeds safety into every stage of development and use, rather than treating it as an afterthought.
Understanding Its Core Principles
ISO 14971 is the international standard for applying risk management to medical devices. This scope is broad, covering everything from physical diagnostic tools (IVD) to complex software as a medical device (SaMD). The primary goal is to ensure the safety of patients, users, and the environment by minimizing potential harm. The standard outlines a continuous, six-step risk management process that includes risk analysis, risk evaluation, risk control, and post-production monitoring. It’s designed to be a living system, meaning you don’t just perform it once and file it away. Instead, you continually review and update your risk assessment as new information becomes available throughout the product’s life.
Meeting Regulatory Requirements
Adopting ISO 14971 isn’t just good practice—it’s a fundamental expectation for market access. Regulatory bodies worldwide, including the FDA in the United States, Health Canada, and European authorities, all require medical device manufacturers to have a robust risk management process in place. While the standard itself isn’t a law, it is the harmonized standard that these agencies all recognize and reference. Following ISO 14971 is the most direct way to demonstrate that you have identified potential hazards, evaluated the associated risks, and implemented effective controls. Proper documentation of this process is essential for your regulatory submissions and is a key focus during audits and inspections.
Why It’s Worth Implementing
Beyond satisfying regulatory demands, implementing ISO 14971 offers significant business advantages. A structured approach to risk management leads to safer, more reliable, and more effective products, which builds trust with both patients and healthcare providers. This process provides a clear framework for making difficult decisions, especially when it comes to benefit-risk analysis. Having a comprehensive and up-to-date risk management file also makes you much more prepared for audits, reducing stress and potential delays. Ultimately, integrating these principles into your quality management system helps protect your company’s reputation and bottom line by proactively addressing issues before they can cause harm.
Breaking Down the Risk Management Process
Think of the risk management process not as a linear checklist, but as a continuous cycle that lives and breathes with your product. It’s a structured way to answer fundamental questions: What could go wrong? How likely is it to happen? How bad would it be if it did? And what are we going to do about it? The entire process is designed to help you make informed, defensible decisions that protect patients and your business.
The ISO 14971 standard breaks this down into a few core activities: analyzing, evaluating, and controlling risk. You start by systematically identifying any potential hazards associated with your device—from design and manufacturing to user error. Once you have your list, you estimate the probability and severity of the harm each hazard could cause. This gives you a clear picture of your risk profile, allowing you to prioritize which issues need immediate attention. From there, you implement measures to reduce those risks to an acceptable level and then verify that your actions were effective. It’s a logical flow that ensures safety is built into your device from the ground up, not just tacked on as an afterthought.
How to Analyze Risk
Risk analysis is where your detective work begins. This is the phase where you systematically use available information to identify potential hazards and estimate the associated risk. Think broadly about every stage of your device’s lifecycle, from the raw materials you use to what happens when it’s eventually disposed of. What could fail? How could someone misuse it? What external factors could impact its performance?
The goal is to create a comprehensive list of all foreseeable hazards. For each one, you’ll then estimate its severity (how serious is the potential harm?) and its probability of occurrence. This isn’t about guesswork; it’s about using data from clinical trials, competitor analysis, post-market surveillance, and expert opinion to make educated assessments. This foundational step creates the roadmap for the rest of your risk management activities.
How to Evaluate Risk
Once you’ve analyzed your risks, it’s time to evaluate them. This step involves making a judgment call: is this particular risk acceptable, or does it need to be reduced? To make this decision, you’ll compare your estimated risk against the acceptability criteria you defined in your risk management plan. This is where your company’s policy on safety and risk tolerance comes into play.
Essentially, you’re drawing a line in the sand. Risks that fall below that line might be considered broadly acceptable, while those above it require action. This evaluation helps you focus your resources where they’re needed most, ensuring you’re tackling the most significant threats to patient safety first. If a risk is deemed unacceptable, you move on to the next phase: risk control.
How to Control Risk
Risk control is all about taking action. For every unacceptable risk you identified during the evaluation phase, you need to implement measures to reduce it. The standard outlines a clear hierarchy for these controls. The most effective option is always to design the risk out of the device entirely—what’s known as “inherently safe design.”
If that’s not possible, the next best step is to add protective measures, like safety guards, software alarms, or fail-safes. The final option is to provide information for safety, such as clear instructions, warnings in the user manual, or training programs. You’ll document each control measure you implement and then verify that it effectively reduces the risk as intended and doesn’t introduce any new hazards.
Assessing Residual Risk
After you’ve implemented your control measures, you’re not quite done. You need to go back and assess any risk that remains—this is called residual risk. No control is perfect, and it’s rare to eliminate a risk completely. So, you must re-evaluate the new, lower level of risk to determine if it now meets your acceptability criteria.
This is a critical feedback loop in the process. Did your control measure work as well as you expected? Is the remaining risk now tolerable? If the residual risk is still too high, you may need to implement additional control measures. This iterative process continues until all residual risks are reduced to an acceptable level according to your company’s policy.
Weighing the Benefits Against the Risks
For some devices, even after all control measures are in place, there might still be some significant residual risks. In these cases, you need to conduct a benefit-risk analysis. This involves weighing the medical benefit the device provides to the patient against the remaining risks. For a life-saving device, a higher level of residual risk may be acceptable if the alternative is worse.
This analysis is a key part of your regulatory submission. Authorities like the FDA and European bodies require you to demonstrate that the overall benefits of your device outweigh the overall residual risks. It’s the final justification that your product is safe and effective enough to be on the market, providing a clear rationale for why the remaining risks are worth taking for the good of the patient.
Your Step-by-Step Implementation Guide
Getting started with ISO 14971 can feel like a huge undertaking, but breaking it down into manageable steps makes it much clearer. Think of this as your roadmap. By following these five steps, you can build a robust risk management system that not only satisfies regulators but also results in a safer, more reliable product. This isn’t just about checking boxes; it’s about creating a solid foundation for your product’s entire lifecycle. Let’s walk through exactly what you need to do.
Create Your Plan and Documentation
Before you dive into identifying hazards, you need a game plan. This is your Risk Management Plan. It’s a formal document that outlines exactly how you’ll handle risk from start to finish. Your plan should be a detailed strategy for identifying, assessing, controlling, and monitoring potential risks throughout the entire lifecycle of your medical device. This ensures everyone on your team is on the same page and that your process is consistent and repeatable. Think of it as the constitution for your risk management activities—it defines the rules, roles, and responsibilities. A well-documented plan is your first line of defense in an audit and a critical tool for ensuring patient safety.
Identify Potential Hazards
Now it’s time to play detective. This step, known as Risk Analysis, is all about systematically identifying potential hazards associated with your device. Get your team together and brainstorm everything that could possibly go wrong. Consider the device’s materials, manufacturing process, packaging, instructions, and potential user errors. What happens if a component fails? What if the device is used incorrectly? Look at data from similar products on the market and review any customer complaints or incident reports you can find. The goal is to create a comprehensive list of all foreseeable hazards. Don’t hold back here—a thorough hazard identification process is the bedrock of your entire risk management file.
Estimate and Prioritize Risks
Once you have your list of hazards, you need to figure out which ones pose the biggest threat. This involves estimating the severity of the potential harm and the probability of it occurring. You can’t fix everything at once, so this step helps you prioritize. Remember, ISO 14971 makes it clear that risk management is a total product lifecycle process, so you need to consider risks that could pop up during production and even after the device is on the market. By assigning a value to each risk, you can create a ranked list that shows you exactly where to focus your efforts first. This ensures you’re dedicating your resources to the issues that matter most.
Choose Your Risk Control Measures
With your risks prioritized, it’s time to take action. The goal here is to identify suitable measures to control or eliminate risks and then put them into practice. Your first priority should always be to design the risk out of the device entirely—this is known as inherent safety by design. If that’s not possible, your next best option is to add protective measures, like safety guards or alarms. The last resort is providing information for safety, such as warning labels or training materials. Document every control measure you implement and justify why you chose it. This demonstrates to regulators that you’ve thoughtfully and effectively mitigated potential harm.
Conduct Management Reviews
Risk management isn’t a one-time project; it’s an ongoing commitment. That’s why regular reviews are so important. You need to periodically check in on your risk management process to make sure it’s still effective and to identify any areas for improvement. These reviews should assess whether your control measures are working as intended and determine if any new risks have emerged since the product launched. This is a key part of maintaining your system and ensuring it adapts over time. Consistent management reviews show that your company is dedicated to continuous improvement and proactive about safety, which is exactly what regulators want to see.
Common Challenges (and How to Handle Them)
Putting ISO 14971 into practice is a significant step, and like any new process, it comes with a few common hurdles. But don’t worry—these are challenges that countless companies have successfully addressed, and they are far from insurmountable. The key is to know what to expect and have a solid plan in place before you even begin. In the high-stakes world of medical devices, where patient safety is paramount, simply “checking a box” for risk management isn’t enough. You need a robust, living process that integrates seamlessly into your daily operations.
This is where many teams hit a snag. They struggle with meshing ISO 14971 with existing quality standards, get bogged down in documentation, or lose track of risks once a product is on the market. Other common issues include securing the necessary resources from leadership and navigating the myths surrounding the standard itself. In this section, we’ll walk through each of these frequent sticking points and provide clear, actionable steps for handling them. With a proactive approach, you can turn these potential roadblocks into opportunities to build a more resilient quality framework and, ultimately, a safer product.
Integrating with Other Quality Standards
One of the first questions that comes up is how ISO 14971 fits with other standards, especially ISO 13485. While ISO 13485 does touch on risk, it doesn’t require the same in-depth, lifecycle-wide approach that ISO 14971 mandates. Think of them as partners: ISO 13485 is your overall Quality Management System (QMS) framework, and ISO 14971 is the specialized process you plug in for risk management for medical devices. The best way to handle this is to fully integrate your ISO 14971 activities into your QMS, ensuring that risk management is a consideration at every stage, from design and development to post-market surveillance.
Getting the Documentation Right
Your Risk Management File is the central hub for all your risk activities, and keeping it accurate and up-to-date can feel like a full-time job. The secret is to treat it as a living document, not a one-off project you complete and file away. After you assess risks and decide on your control strategies, you need to create a written plan. This plan should be regularly reviewed and updated as new information becomes available. Set a schedule for periodic reviews and assign clear ownership to ensure your documentation always reflects the current state of your product and its associated risks.
Keeping an Eye on Post-Market Activities
Risk management doesn’t stop once your product hits the market. In fact, ISO 14971 is very clear that the process covers the entire product lifecycle, including production and post-production phases. This means you need a solid system for collecting and analyzing data from the field, such as customer complaints, service reports, and manufacturing trends. These post-market insights are invaluable for identifying new hazards or re-evaluating existing risks. The key challenges for risk management often arise from neglecting this phase, so make sure your feedback loops are robust and that this data actively informs your Risk Management File.
Allocating the Right Resources
Effective risk management requires time, expertise, and financial investment. Getting the necessary buy-in from leadership can sometimes be a challenge, especially if they view it solely as a compliance cost. To handle this, frame risk management as a fundamental investment in product quality and patient safety. When you design and manufacture high-quality medical devices, you build trust with both healthcare providers and patients. Present a clear plan that outlines the resources needed—whether it’s for training, software, or dedicated personnel—and connect it directly to the benefits of reduced recalls, improved product performance, and a stronger brand reputation.
Debunking Certification Myths
Let’s clear up a common misconception: you cannot get your company “certified” in ISO 14971. Unlike ISO 13485, which is a certifiable standard for a QMS, ISO 14971 is a process standard. You don’t receive a separate ISO 14971 certification. Instead, your conformity with the ISO 14971 process is audited as part of your broader QMS certification audit (like ISO 13485). Understanding this distinction is important. It helps you focus your efforts on correctly implementing the risk management process within your quality system, rather than chasing a certification that doesn’t exist.
Your Toolkit for Risk Assessment
Once you have a solid plan, it’s time to get into the nitty-gritty of assessing risk. This isn’t about guesswork; it’s about using established, systematic methods to identify what could go wrong and how serious it might be. Think of these tools as the essential instruments in your risk management workshop. They provide structure to your analysis, help you prioritize your efforts, and create a clear, defensible record of your decisions.
The goal is to move from a vague sense of potential problems to a concrete, prioritized list of risks you can actively manage. Tools like Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) help you look at your device or process piece by piece to see where failures could occur. Others, like Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), let you start with a major failure and work backward to find all the potential root causes. By combining these methods with quantitative measures like Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs), you can make informed decisions about where to focus your resources. And to keep it all organized, the right software and a well-structured documentation system are non-negotiable. Let’s walk through each of these tools so you can see how they fit into a practical, effective risk management process.
Using Risk Matrices and FMEA
A risk matrix is a simple yet powerful tool for visualizing risk. It typically plots the likelihood of a hazard occurring against the severity of its potential harm, helping you quickly categorize risks as low, medium, or high. This visual aid makes it easier to communicate risk levels to your team and stakeholders.
To populate that matrix, you’ll want to use a systematic method like Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA). FMEA is a bottom-up approach where you examine each component or process step to identify potential failure modes, their causes, and their effects. It’s a proactive way to think through everything that could go wrong before your product ever reaches the market, allowing you to address potential issues at the design stage.
Applying Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
While FMEA looks at individual failures and works its way up, Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) does the opposite. FTA is a top-down, deductive failure analysis that starts with a specific, undesirable event (like a complete device failure) and works backward to identify all the potential contributing factors.
This method is especially useful for complex systems where multiple smaller issues could combine to cause a major problem. By mapping out the logical relationships between different events, you can uncover hidden dependencies and critical failure paths that might not be obvious with other methods. FTA helps you understand the root causes of the most significant potential hazards, giving you a clear target for your risk control measures.
Calculating Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs)
To move from a qualitative to a quantitative assessment, many teams use Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs). An RPN is calculated by assigning a score (e.g., 1-10) to three key factors for each potential failure: its severity, its likelihood of occurrence, and the likelihood of detecting it before it causes harm. You then multiply these three numbers together to get the RPN.
This simple calculation gives you a numerical value for each risk, making it easy to rank them from most to least critical. A higher RPN indicates a more urgent risk that should be prioritized for mitigation. This data-driven approach helps you focus your time and resources where they will have the greatest impact on safety.
Finding the Right Software
Managing all this data manually can be overwhelming, especially for complex devices. That’s where a dedicated risk management solution comes in. The right software can streamline your entire process, from hazard identification to documentation. When choosing a platform, look for one that is user-friendly, affordable, and integrates smoothly with your existing quality management systems.
Good software automates calculations, links related documents, and maintains a clear audit trail, which is invaluable during inspections. It helps ensure consistency across your team and makes it much easier to keep your risk management file up-to-date as your product evolves or new information becomes available. It’s an investment that pays off in efficiency and compliance.
Setting Up Your Documentation System
Your documentation is the ultimate proof of your risk management efforts. ISO 14971 requires you to maintain a comprehensive record of all your activities in a dedicated Risk Management File. This file is a living document that contains your risk management plan, hazard analyses, risk evaluations, control measures, and any reviews or updates.
Think of this file as the complete story of how you made your device safe. It needs to be organized, traceable, and readily available for auditors. A well-structured documentation system not only ensures compliance but also serves as a valuable internal resource, providing a clear rationale for every safety-related decision you’ve made throughout the product lifecycle.
How to Maintain Your Risk Management System
Getting your risk management system up and running is a huge accomplishment, but the work doesn’t stop there. Think of your system not as a finished project, but as a living part of your organization that needs regular attention to stay effective. Maintenance is about creating a cycle of review, feedback, and improvement that keeps your product safe and your company compliant throughout its entire lifecycle. A static risk management file sitting on a shelf is a liability. The market changes, new information about your device becomes available, and regulations evolve. A well-maintained system adapts to these changes, ensuring your risk assessments are always current and relevant.
This proactive approach isn’t just about checking a box for auditors; it’s about building a resilient quality culture. It transforms risk management from a compliance exercise into a strategic advantage that protects patients and your brand. By continuously monitoring your processes, integrating risk into your broader quality system, training your team, and tracking your performance, you can manage risks effectively long after your product has launched. This ongoing commitment ensures that your initial hard work continues to pay off, safeguarding your product’s integrity and your company’s reputation in the long run.
Monitor Your Process Continuously
Your risk management responsibilities extend far beyond product launch. As one expert puts it, risk management is a continuous process that only ends when the last device is off the market. This means you need a robust system for post-market surveillance to actively collect and review production and post-production data. This includes customer feedback, service reports, complaints, and published clinical literature. This real-world information is invaluable for identifying new hazards or re-evaluating the effectiveness of your existing risk controls, allowing you to update your risk management file with the most current information.
Integrate with Your Quality System
Risk management shouldn’t be an isolated activity. To be truly effective, it must be woven into the very fabric of your Quality Management System (QMS). While standards like ISO 13485 include some risk-based requirements, they don’t cover the full lifecycle approach of ISO 14971. True integration means that risk is a key input for everything from design controls and supplier evaluations to handling non-conformances and CAPAs. When you make a design change, for example, your change control process should automatically trigger a review of its impact on risk. This ensures that risk is always a consideration, not just a separate task.
Keep Your Team Trained
Your risk management system is only as strong as the people who implement it. Every team member, from engineering to marketing, should understand their specific role in identifying and managing risks. This requires more than just a one-time training session. You should provide ongoing employee training to keep everyone up-to-date on your procedures, their responsibilities, and any changes in regulatory requirements. Regular refreshers ensure that risk management remains a top-of-mind priority across the organization and reinforces a culture of safety and compliance. A well-informed team is your best asset for maintaining an effective system.
Track Key Performance Indicators
How do you know if your risk management process is actually working? You need to measure it. Establishing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) gives you concrete data to monitor the health and effectiveness of your system. These metrics can help you spot trends, identify areas for improvement, and demonstrate compliance to regulators. Consider tracking KPIs such as the number of post-market risks identified, the average time to implement risk controls, or the frequency of adverse event reports. By regularly reviewing these indicators, you can make data-driven decisions to refine your process and ensure it’s performing as intended.
Choosing the Right Risk Management Partner
Figuring out the requirements of ISO 14971 can feel like a massive undertaking, but you don’t have to go it alone. Bringing in a risk management partner can provide the expertise and resources you need to build a compliant and effective system from the ground up. The right partner acts as an extension of your team, guiding you through the complexities of risk analysis, control, and documentation. They can help you avoid common pitfalls, streamline your processes, and ensure your medical device meets the highest safety standards.
However, choosing that partner is a critical decision. You’re not just buying a piece of software or a set of templates; you’re investing in a relationship that will directly impact your product’s success and your company’s reputation. It’s important to find a firm that understands your specific product, your market, and the unique challenges you face. A great partner doesn’t offer a one-size-fits-all solution. Instead, they work with you to develop a tailored risk management framework that integrates seamlessly with your existing operations and sets you up for long-term success.
What to Look for in a Solution
When you start evaluating potential partners, it’s easy to get focused on the price tag. While affordability is definitely a factor, it’s more helpful to think in terms of value. The cheapest option isn’t always the best if it leaves you with gaps in your compliance. Look for a partner who offers a comprehensive solution that covers every stage of the risk management lifecycle, from initial planning to post-market surveillance. Your ideal partner should have a deep understanding of ISO 14971 and a proven track record of helping companies like yours achieve compliance. Ask for case studies or references to see their expertise in action.
The Importance of Implementation Support
A great risk management plan is only effective if it’s implemented correctly. That’s why hands-on support is non-negotiable. A good partner won’t just hand you a manual and wish you luck. They will guide you through every step, from training your team on the new processes to helping you configure software and create your initial risk management file. This kind of implementation support is crucial for getting your system off the ground smoothly and ensuring everyone on your team is confident in their roles and responsibilities. It’s the difference between a plan that sits on a shelf and one that becomes a living part of your quality culture.
Checking for Integration Capabilities
Your risk management process doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It needs to connect with your broader quality management system (QMS) to be truly effective. A disconnected system can lead to duplicate work, inconsistent data, and critical oversights. Before committing to a partner, ask how their solutions integrate with other systems. Can their software sync with your existing QMS? Do their processes align with other standards you follow, like ISO 13485? Seamless integration streamlines everything, making it easier to manage documentation, track changes, and maintain a complete and accurate picture of your product’s risk profile.
Ensuring Access to Compliance Tools
Theory is one thing, but practical application is another. The right partner will equip you with the tangible tools you need to execute your risk management plan effectively. This could include validated software for conducting risk assessments, customizable templates for your risk management file, and checklists to prepare for audits. These resources help standardize your approach and reduce the administrative burden on your team. Having access to proven compliance tools ensures you’re not just meeting the requirements on paper but are also building a robust and repeatable process that consistently produces safe and effective medical devices.
How J&JCC Group Can Help
At J&JCC Group, we specialize in turning regulatory hurdles into manageable processes. We understand that ISO 14971 is more than just a standard to meet—it’s a commitment to patient safety. Our team of experts provides the hands-on support and strategic guidance you need to build a compliant risk management system tailored to your specific products. We don’t just advise; we partner with you to implement practical solutions, from developing your risk management plan to providing ongoing support for post-market activities. With our help, you can confidently manage risk and bring your medical devices to market.
Related Articles
- Medical Device Risk Management: A Practical Guide
- Medical Device Security Risk Assessment: A Guide
- Medical Device Risk Assessment: Your Step-by-Step Guide
Frequently Asked Questions
How is ISO 14971 different from the risk requirements in ISO 13485? That’s a great question because it’s a common point of confusion. Think of it this way: ISO 13485 is your overall quality management system (QMS) framework, and it requires you to apply a risk-based approach to your processes. ISO 14971, on the other hand, is the specific, detailed standard dedicated entirely to managing risks associated with the medical device itself, throughout its entire lifecycle. While they work together, ISO 14971 provides the in-depth methodology that your QMS will reference for product safety.
Do we have to eliminate every single risk we identify? No, and in most cases, that would be impossible. The goal of risk management isn’t to eliminate all risk but to reduce it to an acceptable level. After you implement control measures, you’ll assess the remaining “residual risk.” If that risk is still significant, you then perform a benefit-risk analysis to demonstrate that the medical benefits your device provides to patients outweigh any remaining risks. It’s about making informed, defensible decisions about safety.
Is this just a one-time project we complete before we launch our product? Absolutely not. This is one of the most important principles of ISO 14971. Risk management is a continuous process that covers the entire lifecycle of your device, from the initial concept to the day it’s taken off the market. You must have a system in place to collect data from production and post-market activities, like customer complaints or service reports, and use that information to regularly review and update your risk assessments.
Our company is small. How can we manage such a complex process? It can definitely feel intimidating, but the process is scalable. The key for a small team is to be organized and efficient from the start. Begin with a clear and simple Risk Management Plan that defines your process and acceptability criteria. Focus your resources on the highest-priority risks first. Using well-structured templates and integrating risk activities directly into your design process, rather than treating it as a separate task, can make it much more manageable.
What’s the most common mistake you see companies make? The most frequent misstep is treating the Risk Management File as a static document that gets completed and then filed away. Companies often put a huge amount of effort into the pre-market analysis but then fail to maintain it with post-market data. Your risk file should be a living document that evolves as you learn more about your device in the real world. Neglecting this post-market phase not only puts you out of compliance but also means you’re missing valuable opportunities to improve your product’s safety.